{"id":1381,"date":"2006-09-22T08:42:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-22T15:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/2006\/09\/22\/still-speaking-of-tv\/"},"modified":"2006-09-22T08:42:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-22T15:42:00","slug":"still-speaking-of-tv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/2006\/09\/22\/still-speaking-of-tv\/","title":{"rendered":"Still Speaking of TV"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">(At Bryan&#8217;s request, I&#8217;ve reformatted the quoted email sections for readability.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);\">CKL:<\/span><br \/>Deadwood is great, but very particular. You may want to give it a<br \/>couple more episodes.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);\">Bryan:<\/span><br \/>Karin was firmer in her &#8220;no&#8221; vote than I. We had a couple of problems with<br \/>it. First, and perhaps this is just me getting old, but I found it very<br \/>difficult to understand what the characters were saying. I had to keep<br \/>rewinding scene after scene which just made watching the episode more work<br \/>than fun. Maybe the sampler disc we were viewing contained a bad copy of the<br \/>pilot, but the picture looked great and we didn&#8217;t have the sound problem<br \/>with the other pilots on the disc. Perhaps the fault lies with the sound<br \/>crew for the show.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);\">CKL:<\/span><br \/>Yeah, we still have that problem sometimes&#8211; it&#8217;s not a technical issue, it&#8217;s just the way the dialogue is written.  I actually like it; it&#8217;s almost Shakespearean in its vocabulary and rhythms, and the juxtaposition with the filthy environment is central to the show, IMHO.  And speaking of filth&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);\">Bryan:<\/span><br \/>The second problem we had with the show was its anachronistic use of foul<br \/>language. I&#8217;m no prude and I like fucking foul language as much as the next<br \/>guy, but even in the rough-and-tumble old west I doubt there was much use of<br \/>bodily-function-oriented foul language. My understanding is that the foul<br \/>language of choice back then was sacrilegious since that was more taboo at<br \/>the time. In later years, as sacrilegious language began to lose its edge,<br \/>bodily-function language became more in vogue. In addition, the use of foul<br \/>language seemed over-frequent and gratuitous. I could just picture HBO execs<br \/>telling the writers to add in more foul language and nudity (and spectacular<br \/>gore) so they could demonstrate the difference in content between<br \/>premium-cable and free-network fare. Again, it isn&#8217;t so much the subject<br \/>matter (language, nudity, gore) I mind as much as its unnecessary use. If<br \/>the show contained frequent and unnecessary references to ping-pong I would<br \/>have had a similar objection.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);\">CKL:<\/span><br \/>I get that.  I couldn&#8217;t watch NYPD Blue because of the ridiculuous camera work, which would jerk around constantly and for no reason, even during static scenes.  I know it was supposed to artificially increase tension, and didn&#8217;t otherwise affect the quality of the writing or acting, but it irritated me so much that I couldn&#8217;t watch it at all.<\/p>\n<p>So maybe Deadwood just isn&#8217;t for you.  I will say that not all the characters are uniformly foul-mouthed, and later episodes are more judicious in their use of certain&#8230; phrases.  If you&#8217;re a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Veronica_Mars\">Veronica Mars<\/a> fan, you may want to rent the episodes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hbo.com\/deadwood\/episode\/season1\/episode07.shtml\">&#8220;Bullock Returns To The Camp&#8221;<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hbo.com\/deadwood\/episode\/season1\/episode08.shtml\">&#8220;Suffer The Little Children&#8221;<\/a> to see Kirsten Bell in a very different role.  (And if you&#8217;re not a Veronica Mars fan, that&#8217;s another good show you should check out.)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);\">Bryan:<\/span><br \/>After reading about all the new shows, there wasn&#8217;t a single one I felt<br \/>excited about seeing. The best I could muster was a half-hearted stirring to<br \/>maybe give one or two a try. True, I was reading about them in TV Guide,<br \/>which I subscribed to when it changed formats and within a few issues<br \/>decided THAT was a big mistake. That magazine has become SO fluffy and<br \/>breathless I can barely stand wading through it to get information about<br \/>what&#8217;s coming up. I&#8217;m letting my subscription run out. If only I could find<br \/>a source of serious and discerning editorial opinion about TV shows!<br \/>Entertainment Weekly sometimes hits the mark, but I usually can&#8217;t get past<br \/>its smart-alecky hipster tone.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);\">CKL:<\/span><br \/>I usually flip through EW and read the few articles I care about in each issue.  I don&#8217;t mind the snarkiness too much.<\/p>\n<p>I listen to the KFOG podcast, on which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sfgate.com\/cgi-bin\/blogs\/sfgate\/indexn?blogid=24\">TV critic Tim Goodman<\/a> shows up a few times a month&#8211; it&#8217;s fun because he discusses things with other people, and generally knows what he&#8217;s talking about.  It&#8217;s a short segment and thus not very in-depth, but has pointed me to interesting things.  The podcast is clearly labeled so you can just listen to Tim Goodman&#8217;s segments:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kfog.com\/podcast.asp\">http:\/\/www.kfog.com\/podcast.asp<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Of course, if you don&#8217;t like Tim Goodman, that&#8217;s probably not for you either.  \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>~CKL<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(At Bryan&#8217;s request, I&#8217;ve reformatted the quoted email sections for readability.) CKL:Deadwood is great, but very particular. You may want to give it acouple more episodes. Bryan:Karin was firmer in her &#8220;no&#8221; vote than I. We had a couple of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[1,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}