{"id":1338,"date":"2007-02-15T17:30:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-16T01:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/2007\/02\/15\/hot-under-the-collar\/"},"modified":"2007-02-15T17:30:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-16T01:30:00","slug":"hot-under-the-collar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/2007\/02\/15\/hot-under-the-collar\/","title":{"rendered":"Hot Under the Collar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Since jra doesn&#8217;t allow comments on his blog, I&#8217;m using this post to respond to his <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.nella.org\/archives\/2007\/02\/another_theory.html\">&#8220;Another theory of climate change&#8221;<\/a> post.  <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Blogwar!<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Actually, this is not so much a rebuttal as an encouragement to read the original <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/\">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)<\/a> report <strike>attacked<\/strike>referenced in the <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Times Online<\/span> article which prompted jra&#8217;s post.  Unless you failed high school science, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/SPM2feb07.pdf\">Summary for Policymakers (1.3MB PDF)<\/a> shouldn&#8217;t take you more than half an hour to get through.  (Thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/scq.ubc.ca\/\"><span style=\"font-style:italic;\">The Science Creative Quarterly<\/span><\/a> for providing an actual link, which <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">Times Online<\/span> cleverly omitted.)  The complete report will be published this summer by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/us\/catalogue\/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521705967\">Cambridge University Press<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>And, just to be fair, here&#8217;s a link to the dissenter&#8217;s publications: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dsri.dk\/~hsv\/\">Henrik Svensmark<\/a> has written several papers on his cloud-cover-and-cosmic-rays theory since 1997.  I&#8217;ll also point out that Svensmark&#8217;s own 1997 article references the 1992 IPCC report, and even <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">he<\/span> does not <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">deny<\/span> the role of human activity in global climate change&#8211;he merely questions whether other, natural factors have a greater effect, and if so, how much greater?<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no question that the discussion of global warming has become politicized and polarized, and that is unfortunate as well as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/B000ICL3KG\/curtiscchensfree\">inconvenient<\/a>.  While it&#8217;s true that our best science is still lacking&#8211;the IPCC itself admits that their understanding of solar irradiance and how it affects global climate is <span style=\"font-weight:bold;\">low<\/span> (see figure SPM-2 on page 4 of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/SPM2feb07.pdf\">Summary for Policymakers<\/a>)&#8211;it&#8217;s still <span style=\"font-weight:bold;\">science<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p>I have no problem with &#8220;considering all the possibilities,&#8221; as jra says, but that should include <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">all<\/span> the possibilities&#8211;including the prevailing view that greenhouse gases are a major cause of global warming&#8211;and should mean judging each hypothesis on its <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">scientific<\/span> merits, and not whether or not you think people have been brainwashed into believing it.<\/p>\n<p>If you don&#8217;t buy the science behind how to determine the causes of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grida.no\/climate\/vital\/04.htm\">radiative forcing<\/a>, fine.  Just make sure you&#8217;re questioning the science, not the politics.<\/p>\n<p>~CKL<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since jra doesn&#8217;t allow comments on his blog, I&#8217;m using this post to respond to his &#8220;Another theory of climate change&#8221; post. Blogwar! Actually, this is not so much a rebuttal as an encouragement to read the original Intergovernmental Panel&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sci-tech"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.curtiscchen.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}